Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Your assignment woes end here!

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

Very detailed project requiring close attention.

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO4 and 8)

CO4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO4 and 8)

Points: This assignment is worth 225 points.

Due Date: Submit the completed Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

  1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles: Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

Velayutham, S. G., Chandra, S. R., Bharath, S., & Shankar, R. G. (2017). Quantitative balance and gait measurement in patients with frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer diseases: A pilot study. Indian Journal Of Psychological Medicine, 39(2), 176-182. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.203132. http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=122248443&site=eds-live&scope=site (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Pals, R. S., Hansen, U. M., Johansen, C. B., Hansen, C. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Fleischer, J., & Willaing, I. (2015). Making sense of a new technology in clinical practice: A qualitative study of patient and physician perspectives. BMC Health Services Research15(1), 1-10. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-1071-1 http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=her&AN=109884152&site=eds-live (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

  1. Download the Reading Research Literature form (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  2. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment at http://www.brainshark.com/devry/vu?pi=zGCzbNjK4zHr05z0. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
  3. Type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your form does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.
  4. Please post questions about this assignment to the Q & A Forum.
  5. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_W5_Reading_Research_Literature_Form_Smith.docx.
  6. Submit the completed form by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

**Academic Integrity Reminder**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Please see the grading criteria and rubrics on this page.

NOTE: Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.

Rubric

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

NR439_Reading_Research_Literature

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVelayutham, et al article: Question 1 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article. 9.0 ptsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 4.0 ptsOffers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any purpose for the research.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 2 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 9.0 ptsMostly identifies the research question that the author described. 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 4.0 ptsOffers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research question.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 3 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the research design of the study. 9.0 ptsMostly describes the research design of the study. 8.0 ptsSomewhat describes the research design of the study. 4.0 ptsOffers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research design.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 4 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 9.0 ptsMostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article. 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article. 4.0 ptsOffers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any population.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 5 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?
10.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. 9.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 8.0 ptsCorrectly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 4.0 ptsMisidentifies the sampling approach. 0.0 ptsDoesn’t explain any sampling approach.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 6 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in general. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. 4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any data collection procedures.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 7 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 8.0 ptsDescribes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 4.0 ptsDescribes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe how data were analyzed.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 8 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the limitations in the study. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 4.0 ptsMinimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any limitations for the study.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 9 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 4.0 ptsMinimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any author conclusions.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 10 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.
10.0 ptsDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 9.0 ptsGenerally, describes how this research advances knowledge. 8.0 ptsBriefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePals et al article: Question 11 PurposeIdentifies the purpose of the research article.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the purpose of the research article. 9.0 ptsMostly identifies the purpose of the research article 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the purpose of the research article. 4.0 ptsOffers a purpose for the article, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any purpose for the research.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 12 Research QuestionIdentifies the research question implied in the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given. 9.0 ptsMostly identifies the research question that the author described. 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies the research question that the author described. 4.0 ptsOffers a research question, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research question.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 13 Research DesignDescribes the research design of the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the research design of the study. 9.0 ptsMostly describes the research design of the study. 8.0 ptsSomewhat describes the research design of the study. 4.0 ptsOffers a research design, but incorrectly identifies it. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any research design.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 14 PopulationIdentifies and describes the population.
10.0 ptsCorrectly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article. 9.0 ptsMostly describes identifies and describes the population of the research article. 8.0 ptsSomewhat identifies and describes the population of the research article. 4.0 ptsOffers a population, but incorrectly identifies it as the one in the research article. 0.0 ptsDoes not identify any population.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 15 SampleWas the sample adequate for the research design?
10.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, and if it was adequate. 9.0 ptsCorrectly explains if the sampling approach was appropriate for the research design studied, but fails to correctly identify if it was adequate. 8.0 ptsCorrectly explains the sampling approach, but incorrectly identifies if it was, or was not, appropriate or adequate. 4.0 ptsMisidentifies the sampling approach. 0.0 ptsDoesn’t explain any sampling approach.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 16 Data CollectionDescribe the data collection procedure.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in detail. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes the data collection procedure in general. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the data collection procedure but fails to describe all of it. 4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes the data collection procedure, or omits most of the information. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any data collection procedures.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 17 Data AnalysisHow were the data analyzed?
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes how the all of the data were analyzed. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes how most of the data were analyzed. 8.0 ptsDescribes how the data were analyzed, but may contain some misinformation. 4.0 ptsDescribes incorrectly how data were analyzed, or omitted large portions of the information. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe how data were analyzed.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 18 LimitationsDescribes the limitations in the study.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the limitations in the study. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the limitations in the study. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the limitations in the study, but may omit one or two. 4.0 ptsMinimally describes the limitations of the study, or misidentifies them. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any limitations for the study.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 19 ConclusionsDescribes the authors’ conclusions.
10.0 ptsCorrectly describes all of the authors’ conclusions. 9.0 ptsCorrectly describes most of the authors’ conclusions. 8.0 ptsCorrectly describes some of the authors’ conclusions, but may omit one or two. 4.0 ptsMinimally describes the author’s conclusions, or misidentifies them. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe any author conclusions.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestion 20 Advances KnowledgeHow does this advance knowledge in the field.
10.0 ptsDescribes in-depth how this research advances knowledge in the field. 9.0 ptsGenerally, describes how this research advances knowledge. 8.0 ptsBriefly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 4.0 ptsIncorrectly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field. 0.0 ptsDoes not describe how the research advances knowledge in the field.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle and WritingNames file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.
25.0 ptsCorrectly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors. 22.0 ptsOne to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 20.0 ptsFive to eight errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax. 10.0 ptsNine to twelve errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax 0.0 ptsThirteen or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.
25.0 pts
Total Points: 225.0

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS

Your assignment woes end here!

Who We Are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.

 

Is it hard to Place an Order?

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

1. Click on the  “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.

2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.

3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.

4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.

100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.

Order Button Paypal

Always Order High-Quality Academic Papers from HERE 

5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so that it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

You cannot copy content of this page