Titanic Case Study Analysis ( Ethical Perspective)

For this assignment, research an engineering ethics case study of your choice and demonstrate an ability to analyze the the issue from an ethical perspective. Summarize the most important facts about the case, and explain why particular decisions or actions were immoral.

*At least two academic sources. · Explain the details of the issues/cases you are discussing.◦ What decisions were made in this case? Why did the participants do what they did?◦ Were the relevant decisions/actions moral? Why or why not?◦ What happened leading up to the failure? What were the focal and auxiliary consequences?◦ What building and professional codes were in place at the time? Were they followed?◦ Be specific about the people, places, companies, decisions, events, etc. involved in each case.· Use relevant concepts from class to support your point of view on the issue.◦ How do each of the moral theories and principles weigh in? Don’t “force it,” but use moral theory when appropriate to support your view.◦ From an ethical perspective, what is the ultimate conclusion you have arrived at through your research of the issue?◦ How did individuals related to the case fail to be professional and/or moral?Read full instructions attached below.PHIL 215 – Engineering EthicsPaper #3Due: November 14thFormat: 4 pages, 12 pt. Times New Roman, 1”margins, double-spaced,stapled, Works Cited pg, in-text citations (author p#)

Paper #3 – Case Study Assignment

For this assignment, research an engineering ethics case study of your choice and demonstrate an ability to analyze the the issue from an ethical perspective. Summarize the most important facts about the case, and explain why particular decisions or actions were immoral.

· Choose at least one real-world case study to investigate.· Choose any case which involved engineers and some type of moral dilemma/controversy.· Be sure to choose a real case, not a fictional “decision scenario”· Try to select a topic not covered in class.· Do some independent research and use at least two high-quality, in-depth, academic sources.· Utilize CSU research databases and online engineering ethics databases in your research.· See the instructor if you have trouble selecting a topic.· Explain the details of the issues/cases you are discussing.· What decisions were made in this case? Why did the participants do what they did?· Were the relevant decisions/actions moral? Why or why not?· What happened leading up to the failure? What were the focal and auxiliary consequences?· What building and professional codes were in place at the time? Were they followed?· Be specific about the people, places, companies, decisions, events, etc. involved in each case.· Use relevant concepts from class to support your point of view on the issue.· How do each of the moral theories and principles weigh in? Don’t “force it,” but use moral theory when appropriate to support your view.· From an ethical perspective, what is the ultimate conclusion you have arrived at through your research of the issue?· How did individuals related to the case fail to be professional and/or moral?Remember :· Think about what your final conclusion will be – what claim do you want to make? Mention this in your introductory paragraph.· Use evidence (premises) which demonstrate that your point of view is right. Draw on what you have learned about moral principles and theories.· This assignment is intended to help you practice researching and analyzing a moral failure in the engineering world. The 8-page Term Paper will follow the same essential guidelines.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Titanic Case Study Analysis ( Ethical Perspective)

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. Titanic Case Study Analysis ( Ethical Perspective)

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

  

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper